naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: recording owl vocalizations

Subject: RE: recording owl vocalizations
From: Rob Danielson <>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:07:44 -0500
20 feet! What fun!  $500 for a ME66/K6 should get you fine mono 
recordings for sure.  I agree that stereo imaging can be useful in 
figuring out who is talking to whom about what. There are often more 
owls involved in the discussion than I first detect, both in the 
field and when listening to recordings.

If stereo imaging interests you and the background sound levels are 
low, I'd consider  binaural Shure 183's ($200 pair). Huge improvement 
over radio shack mics. You could mount them in a dummy head, a wood 
block like Curt Olson's designs or buy a SASS fixture sans mics from 
Crown. M-S is another, more expensive option. The students here fight 
over our two NT1A/CAD 179 M-S rigs that use MP2 preamps. I'm trying 
to get a PIP compatible phantom power supply which would open more 
possibilties.

Isn't it likely that your presence is a pretty significant topic in 
their discussions?  Maybe there's a lot of road and other noise so 
there's plenty of agitation anyway. I'm sure you've thought about 
this. If you want to leave the scene, an NH-1 or NH 910 can be set to 
record in HiSP mode for ~5 hours. Requires a PC for digital transfers.

To focus on calls coming from two areas, a pair of unidirectional 
Rode NT-3's for about $300 are maybe worth considering. Perhaps mount 
them on separate tripods with nice, swivel mounts, in good 
shock-mounts with zeps? Anyway, I'd definitely think a bit more about 
stereo before taking a $500 mono plunge.  Rob D.

  = = = = = =

At 11:05 PM -0700 6/24/05, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>The mini disk should fit the bill alright and you would certainly be able to
>upload your recordings to your computer and software.
>If your budget is tight, consider the K6/ME66 combination made by
>Sennheiser.
>The ME66 would be a better mic for the long distant calls but you will not
>be able to record them in stereo unless you use two mics. A stereo recording
>will help you separate the calls much better in an analyzing program. To
>start off with though, your choice would be a fair combination of mic and
>minidisk. At least with the K6 power supply that you need with the ME66, you
>can buy the cardioid version (ME64) and this too will run with the K6.
>
>
>
>Martyn
>
>Martyn Stewart
>Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
>http://www.naturesound.org
>
>N47.65543   W121.98428
>Redmond. Washington. USA
>Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
>425-898-0462
>-----Original Message-----
>From: 
> On Behalf Of wahpenayo
>Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 10:43 PM
>To: 
>Subject: [Nature Recordists] recording owl vocalizations
>
>I'm working on a study of barred owls in SW Washington and have begun
>to record their vocalizations. I want to upgrade my equipment (not
>hard to do) to get quality recordings, eventually to do comparison
>analysis of their calls. I am looking at the Sony MZNH1 Hi Minidisc
>Recorder, which fits my budget.
>
>I am unsure what kind of microphone would work best. Right now I have
>a ~$40 Radio Shack cardioid mic. There are all kinds of recording
>situations that I will have to deal with. Sometimes the owls are very
>close (20 feet) sometimes 1/4 mile or more away. I want to be able to
>record a pair doing a duet, even when they are on both sides of me.
>
>I have been thinking that another cardioid mic of better quality
>would be the best overall mic, and at sometime in the future get a
>shotgun mic for distant calls.
>
>So right now I am looking at the Sony NH1 and a Sennheiser ME64
>cardioid mic. Can anyone tell me if this is the right choice to begin
>with, and will the recordings be good enough to run through digital
>analysis software?
>
>Thanks for any help.
>
>Bob Pearson
>Packwood, Washington
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU