At 9:45 PM -0800 1/10/05, Dan Dugan wrote:
>
>>ROB DANIELSON:
>>Bet I'm missing something here. As long as the signals are not mixed,
>>wouldn't a header change be enough? 44 100 / 44 087 =3D 1.00029487.
>>Think anyone could detect such a tiny pitch change?
>
>I've never tried that; equivalent to just adjusting the tape speed a
>little. But doesn't it depend on the software that's reading the
>header being able to compensate for a non-standard sample rate file?
>The software has got to do a resampling to do that, like a sample
>rate conversion.
Do you think so? There's no CPU usage increase I've detected in Logic
even with several different ones at once. I'll check the performance
meter next time I'm mixing.
>
>>With +15 feet mic spreads and two MT-90's last summer, I was
>>consistently getting ~1/30 second or ~33ms differences with 80
>>minute takes (digital transfers).
>
>Something wrong with the numbers; 1ms/30 seconds is 2ms/min, 160ms/80 min.
Sorry to confuse. In other words, after lining up the head slates,
the tail slates were separated only ~30 ms over the whole 80 minutes.
Remarkable I thought.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|