naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

LoHz Natural Locations/Representation

Subject: LoHz Natural Locations/Representation
From: Rob Danielson <>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:42:53 -0600
Would something like this work?
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/7560EQWinterValleyPres.wav
(4.6mb)

Minimal presence of a rural valley night equalized for low frequency 
local "air." Car door slam @1000' feet on other side of hill for 
reference. Made with 183's/MD. Rob D.


>From: Lang Elliott <>
>>
>>  It occurs to me that it would be extremely useful to get a totally quiet
>>  ambient recording, perhaps in the far north in dead of winter, which is free
>>  of animal sounds or other nature sounds, but that has a great spaciousness
>>  and a solid low end that is not contaminated by rumble. One could filter out
>>  the high end of the recording using a low pass set somewhere below 1 kHz.
>>  Then the resulting recording could be used to mix with soundscapes where the
>>  low end had to be filtered because of rumble.
>>
>>  While this is cheating, to a degree, it would add back that deep
>>  spaciousness that is lost when the low end is or reduced.
>
>Having wondered around and pointed the SASS/MKH-110 at things, often
>also the SASS/MKH-20 at the same things my take is the big problem with
>this idea is that what's down in that low bass in the way of natural
>sound is not at all the same everywhere. So we are going to have to
>continue to try and work around the man made noise if we are trying to
>reproduce a close resemblance of the original site.
>
>Note switching back and forth between MKH-110's and MKH-20's will make
>the MKH-20's sound like they are giving weak bass.
>
>This low frequency end supplies more than just spaciousness, it's also a
>lot of the emotional content of a place. Even the infrasound enters in,
>we feel it at frequencies well below what our ears can handle.
>
>I'll point to the magnaplans I have for speakers for this sort of thing.
>They can give the low sound you feel without making it too loud.
>Probably because of their very large flat surface area compared to a
>focused cone on a regular subwoofer. They still do not reproduce the
>sound as it was out there, but a lot closer. They won't give that
>focused thump of a subwoofer cone, but natural infrasound is not focused
>like that. The funny thing is folks tend to think that they give poor
>bass as they are so trained to the incorrect bass of cone speakers.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU