naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LoHz Natural Locations/Representation

Subject: Re: LoHz Natural Locations/Representation
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:16:20 -0500
From: Lang Elliott <>

>
> I totally agree with Rob that the low end and related harmonics provides =
a
> tremendous sense of spaciousness. But unfortunately, the low end is often
> clogged with distant pulsating rumble caused by manmade machinery.
>
> It occurs to me that it would be extremely useful to get a totally quiet
> ambient recording, perhaps in the far north in dead of winter, which is f=
ree
> of animal sounds or other nature sounds, but that has a great spaciousnes=
s
> and a solid low end that is not contaminated by rumble. One could filter =
out
> the high end of the recording using a low pass set somewhere below 1 kHz.
> Then the resulting recording could be used to mix with soundscapes where =
the
> low end had to be filtered because of rumble.
>
> While this is cheating, to a degree, it would add back that deep
> spaciousness that is lost when the low end is or reduced.

Having wondered around and pointed the SASS/MKH-110 at things, often
also the SASS/MKH-20 at the same things my take is the big problem with
this idea is that what's down in that low bass in the way of natural
sound is not at all the same everywhere. So we are going to have to
continue to try and work around the man made noise if we are trying to
reproduce a close resemblance of the original site.

Note switching back and forth between MKH-110's and MKH-20's will make
the MKH-20's sound like they are giving weak bass.

This low frequency end supplies more than just spaciousness, it's also a
lot of the emotional content of a place. Even the infrasound enters in,
we feel it at frequencies well below what our ears can handle.

I'll point to the magnaplans I have for speakers for this sort of thing.
They can give the low sound you feel without making it too loud.
Probably because of their very large flat surface area compared to a
focused cone on a regular subwoofer. They still do not reproduce the
sound as it was out there, but a lot closer. They won't give that
focused thump of a subwoofer cone, but natural infrasound is not focused
like that. The funny thing is folks tend to think that they give poor
bass as they are so trained to the incorrect bass of cone speakers.

Walt




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU