Subject: | Re: Mic Self noise and sound filtering (was Digest Number 1557) |
---|---|
From: | Dave Morrison <> |
Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:31:27 -0500 |
Walt wrote: > Ah, most of what you use filtering for! Sampled-noise reduction is only > one technique you throw at this. And kind of minor at that. You throw > everything but the kitchen sink at it. You'd throw the kitchen sink if > it did any good! And learn that nothing substitutes for not recording > it > in the first place. Filtering is a patch effort after the fact. > Everyone > does it, and wishes they did not need it. Walt, Would you be willing to post some before and after examples for the newbies in here....like me? Maybe samples that required both extremes of filtration? Dave <back to lurk mode> ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Wind Protection find, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Wind Protection find, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Mic Self noise and sound filtering (was Digest Number 1557), Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | RE: Re: Mic Self noise and sound filtering (was Digest Number 1557), Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU