Subject: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:33 -0700 |
Gus wrote: >Hello, am new to the group. Thank you for being here. I have been >researching microphones to work with my Sharp MD-DR7 for nature sound >recording. I have seen a number of messages suggesting the Shure >WL183's to be very good, inexpensive mics-as low as $71 each. > >Looking through the Shure specs, I find the WL93 is less expensive, >has greater frequency response, lower noise level, and higher output. > What am I missing here? Thanks for the tip, I'm going to take a look at it. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | WL183 vs. WL93, Gus |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New file uploaded to naturerecordists, naturerecordists |
Previous by Thread: | WL183 vs. WL93, Gus |
Next by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, John Hartog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU