Yeah, I noticed that...although it is pretty flat to below
100Hz...doubt if there is much in the way of sounds I want that is
down there...in any case, I like the slightly higher output(even after
you calculate for the higher output impedance) and the better noise
floor...I have ordered a pair and will report back when they come in....
thanks
gus--- In "John Hartog"
<> wrote:
>
> If you didn't already notice, I posted a pfd from Shure with
> information on both the WL183 and WL93.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/wl183_wl1
> 84_wl185.pdf
>
> It appears that the 93 has a higher frequency range, up to 20kHz,
> where the 183's limit is 17kHz. However, the 183 remains flat to
> below 100Hz while the 93 begins rolling off around 350Hz.
>
> John Hartog
>
> --- In Dan Dugan
> <> wrote:
> > Gus wrote:
> >
> > >Hello, am new to the group. Thank you for being here. I have
> been
> > >researching microphones to work with my Sharp MD-DR7 for
> nature sound
> > >recording. I have seen a number of messages suggesting
> the Shure
> > >WL183's to be very good, inexpensive mics-as low as $71
> each.
> > >
> > >Looking through the Shure specs, I find the WL93 is less
> expensive,
> > >has greater frequency response, lower noise level, and
> higher output.
> > > What am I missing here?
> >
> > Thanks for the tip, I'm going to take a look at it.
> >
> > -Dan Dugan
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|