naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fostex FR-2 v Marantz PMD670

Subject: Re: Fostex FR-2 v Marantz PMD670
From: Rob Danielson <>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:11:26 -0600
At 5:45 PM +0800 3/31/04, Geoff Carey wrote:
>Although a beginner with the technical stuff, I've been recording 
>bird vocalisations for some years now and would like to upgrade to 
>produce non-compressed recordings suitable for spectrographic 
>analysis and publication.
>
>The Fostex FR-2 appears to be almost double the price of the Marantz 
>PMD670 (at least here in HK). Is there any compelling reason for 
>buying the former, rather than the latter, when it comes to my 
>particular interest?
>
>(I searched the archive for clues to this, but didn't find anything. 
>Apologies if I've overlooked anything significant).
>
>Geoff Carey
>Hong Kong
>


For recording/analyzing robust sound levels you might not require an 
FR-2 for 24 bits or the higher quality mic preamp. Those are the 
first two differences that pop out for me. If you do record sounds 
that saturate at low levels, 24 bit and higher sample rates smight be 
very useful in spectrographic analysis for better amplitude and Hz 
definition. You might want to rent a 24bit deck (with an option to 
apply the rental fee to purchase price) and run some tests.  I assume 
the Marantz has the prerecord buffer. Rob D.


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU