| Subject: | RE: Fostex v Marantz v HHB mini-review |
|---|---|
| From: | Dan Dugan <> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:38:45 -0800 |
Brad Brace, you wrote, >I've often wondered if there is a substantial loss of >quality when editing, or applying filters to mp3s and then >re-saving as mp3 format. (?) Sure. Any re-coding is a "generation loss" like copying a tape in the old days. Noise, distortion and artifacts accumulate. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fostex v Marantz v HHB mini-review, Dan Dugan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Fostex v Marantz v HHB mini-review, Martyn Stewart |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fostex v Marantz v HHB mini-review, Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Fostex v Marantz v HHB mini-review, Martyn Stewart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU