[Top] [All Lists]

RE: cd's as archive medium-maybe not?

Subject: RE: cd's as archive medium-maybe not?
From: "Neville Recording" <>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:41:22 -0700
Walter Knapp wrote:
"I have CD-R that were burned as much as 8 years ago that are all fine. I
think part of the problem is that back then we only had slow burners and
the CD-R blanks were made for that. Now we have high speed burners and
it's getting harder to find blanks made for the more reliable slow speed
burning. Burning a high speed blank with slow speed is going to result
in non-standard pit size."

I use an HHB Burnitt CDR 830. I think it would be described as a slow burne=
r? So far I have had no problem with archive material but my oldest materia=
l is only two years old. For CDr's I always buy the best deal at Radi Shack=
! Can anyone recommend reliable CDR's for my unit? You could say that I am =
burning with anticipation.
John Neville

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU