Walt wrote,
>I prefer not to call the process downloading. It's no different than
>transferring from analog tape. You play the sound on the DAT while
>recording it in the iMac. At realtime (1X). It's just another form of
>sound recording.
It is different in that there is no generation loss; DAT to
workstation software transfer done digitally should be bit-perfect.
If I was going to call it a load, I'd say it's an upload, from a
peripheral to a host. But I'd prefer to call it a transfer. A data
file is being transferred from one storage medium to another.
Different formats, same data.
-Dan Dugan
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
>From Tue Mar 8 18:23:18 2005
Message: 16
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 23:49:54 -0500
From: Walter Knapp <>
Subject: Re: Shipping audio gear in the US
Wild Sanctuary wrote:
> With the new Homeland Security mandates in place, it has become a
> real problem to check audio gear through in baggage on the same
> flight, especially if your field equipment is too large to fit (with
> your clothes and other personal items) in a carry-on. The Transp.
> Sec. Agency requires that all bags be left unlocked if they are to be
> checked through as baggage so that they can be inspected by hand.
> Locked bags are summarily broken into.
>
> On a recent flight taken by a colleague, several items (a DAT
> recorder and microphone) were taken out of his Pelican case, never to
> be recovered. Several of the latches arrived at the destination
> unsecured. He was told that he could make a claim which rested on the
> support of a review of video tape of events that occurred within the
> baggage security zone of the airport from which he left, assuming, of
> course, that they were still obtainable. Furthermore, the results of
> his claim would remain unknown for from 4 - 6 months. Also, the
> airlines typically will not now insure baggage containing electronic
> equipment and it is subject to getting lost, as well.
>
> Additionally, if your bags exceed 61 linear inches and/or 70 pounds
> in weight, you are charged an additional $80USD for each "offence."
>
> I'm addressing that problem by sending the baggage locked and insured
> by Airborne Express, which has some really great rates for ground
> delivery and even reasonable ones (providing someone else is paying)
> for 2nd or 3rd day air. I just sent a 94 pound, 62 linear inch
> Pelican case from my place to Denver via Airborne ground (3 day
> delivery) for under $45. That way, it can be tracked and there is a
> reasonable chance that one can recover something if, in fact, it is
> lost.
>
> Anyone else having these problems?
I'm not flying with my gear, so don't have the problems so far.
My suggestion to anyone who does have problems, particularly the theft,
is to make sure and contact their congressman. It's easy to do, you can
even phone their local office. Many in the legislative branch were
doubtful, and need to be reminded of just what this means to law abiding
US citizens. In particular the theft of gear should be drilled into
them. Give them some ammunition to work with.
Also check into insurance, make sure and insure all your gear. Insurance
companies will use their lobbyists if theft becomes a big enough outlay.
In the case of a trip that can be ruined with the loss of gear, insure
the trip too.
Funny how what the terrorists could not do directly, disrupt and mess up
our lives, we are doing for them. They must be cheering. They won.
Walt
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|