Subject: | Sampl rates |
---|---|
From: | "Roger C Boughton" <> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:58:37 -0000 |
Lang asked What are your feelings on sample rate ? Well since I have been using the V my feelings, given good mics, are that the pre-amps are the most important, then 24bit over 16, much more detail, then sample rates 96 over 48 very difficult with my ears to tell the difference. Golden eared ones amongst us would though I'm sure. I use a compromise binaural head and the 24/96 recordings I have done with the V are a major step up in quality which should future proof the quality of my recordings for sometime to come. I hope so anyway, Roger C Boughton [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: New tech direction, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Trains, Vicki Powys |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Does size count?, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Article on Nature Recording, simpsoninmissoula <simpsoninmissoula@yahoo.com> |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU