naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Silence, huh?

Subject: Re: Re: Silence, huh?
From: DeafinONEear <>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:32:43 -0700
Evert,
Unfortunately, this is not a PR stunt-- the album came out long ago and I
have been hearing about this case for at least 6 months.
Soon people will be copyrighting the act of performing music... uhm.... I
mean.... pay no attention to the last comment.
Anyone know where the copyright office is?




At 01:14 PM 9/24/02 -0000, you wrote:
>--- In  DeafinONEear <> wrote:
>> You say you want silence? Well, it's gonna cost you.
>> http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/23/uk.silence/
>> Now how much do you think Nature Recordists owes the Cage estate at
>this
>> point?
>>
>Zach
>
>Heaving read the story twice I can only think that this is a rather
>expensive PR stunt.
>If a piece contains nothing but rests and a title, what is there to
>steal? What is next, 48 bit 512 kHz digitally generated silence?
>
>Regards Evert
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=

>
>
>


(=BA=B7.=B8(=A8*=B7.=B8 =B8.=B7*=A8)=B8.=B7=BA)
=AB.=B7 =B0 =B7.  Zach .=B7 =B0 =B7.=BB
(=B8.=B7=BA(=B8.=B7=A8* *=A8=B7.=B8)=BA=B7.=B8)



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU