Subject: | Re: Silence, huh? |
---|---|
From: | "evertveldhuis" <> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:14:22 -0000 |
--- In DeafinONEear <> wrote: > You say you want silence? Well, it's gonna cost you. > http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/23/uk.silence/ > Now how much do you think Nature Recordists owes the Cage estate at this > point? > Zach Heaving read the story twice I can only think that this is a rather expensive PR stunt. If a piece contains nothing but rests and a title, what is there to steal? What is next, 48 bit 512 kHz digitally generated silence? Regards Evert ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Your homemade quick parabolic mic., Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: Silence, huh?, Marty Michener |
Previous by Thread: | Silence, huh?, DeafinONEear |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Silence, huh?, Marty Michener |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU