Re: hard disc recorder
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:06:02 -0000
I find HD for recording very attractive. And am looking hard for
what to upgrade my laptop to. All recorders are a bunch of parts and
if I need to build my own case I will deal with that. The parts are
small enough now that it is not a big pain.
I will keep my Sony MD's for when I want a shirt pocket recorder but
I really look forward to no compression and keeping me in the drivers
seat on the quality at all levels that I am recording at. The specs
on this years outboard preamps with a/d converters are great and some
come in a small package. The MS OS based machine is still winning
for me so that I can use all it has to offer including remote 10 key
pads for command control of any software recording package choosen.=20
Complete control on length of prerecord buffers is very nice. And
timed record at any intervals is also a field plus.
HD is finally coming to bloom. I will watch it very close.
Back to the field. I have a date with a Warbler.
--- In Walter Knapp <> wrote:
> > The Nomad recorder does have a 1394/firewire jack on it, but it
> > won't appear as a mountable volume for file transfer on Pc or Mac
> > You have to use their proprietary software (Pc only) for file
> > does do 16 bit 48 k linear WAV recording, and can record up to
the 20 gB
> > capacity of the disc as a single sound file! At 16/48, that's
about a thirty
> > hour stereo file. It claims 98 dB sNr.
> The S/N of most digital recorders is way up there. But it will all
> for nothing unless you get mics and preamp to match. You won't find
> mic to match. I doubt that the Nomad is quite that high, btw. Or
> are using some custom statistic, since S/N is usually worked
> dB signal. It sounds more like the dynamic range spec for 16bit,
> even pushing that. It would not matter anyway if you were having the
> digitizing done outboard and shipped into it digital. And then
> transferring that to your computer digital. Your pre and mics and
> connections will determine your S/N.
> We have had a few discussions of the foibles of converting 48k
> rates back to CD. If it can be set the 44k that would be better.
> > Also a nice trend: it has dual battery bays!
> It needs them! HD's are not the most battery friendly things. Does
> buffer and cycle the HD or run it continuous when recording?
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: