naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: battery powered multitrack recording?

Subject: Re: battery powered multitrack recording?
From: Jim Morgan <>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:39:11 -0700
At 01:06 PM 4/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Jim Morgan wrote:
>> 
>> At 10:47 AM 4/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
>> >Oops, try this link... http://www.hhbusa.com/000/pdrive.htm
>> >Wil
>> 
>> Ah, much better. It does sound like it is portable. I hope they don't have
>> all the hassles that they had with the portadisc.
>
>And just what problems with the portadisc are you talking about? 

A review of past postings might refresh your memory


Oh yes,
>records perfectly, never gives any problems, I forgot all about how mine
>works. Yep, definitely need more problems in my life. And this new one
>is almost certain to arrive with at least some bugs.
>
>The new recorder looks to be quite heavy, I'd guess 2-3x the weight of
>the portadisc. Too bad they did not extend to end moldings into grab
>handles. I expect you would not want to be lugging this around on a
>strap for very long. It also looks to be about standard rack width. The
>battery pac looks like the one for my first beta portable video
>recorder. Well, except it appears to be Lion. Extra batteries are going
>to be expensive.
>
>I hope those considering this have 8 sets of quality mics to go with it.
>Using this to make the typical mono recordings would be overkill and a
>half. If it's supplying phantom power to all 8 that's going to add up to
>a significant drain on the battery. Lots of issues to portable recording
>like this. I'm not so sure just how "portable" it will work out.
>
>I don't see anything that looks like a firewire port. That would be the
>most appropriate for this sort of thing. Reasonably fast and hot
>connectable and automatically would appear as a drive on the desktop (on
>a mac anyway, nearly as good in windows), allowing drag and drop
>copying. Looks like it might have a ethernet port. Maybe it's intended
>to sell you a separate drive cabinet for the removable HD. Even at 44k
>sampling rate this would be putting out 80megs/minute, and the modern
>trend is to go to higher rates. So transfer of the recordings is not trivial.
>
>I just got done putting 3 73 gig ultra 160 HD's in my G4. And that's for
>convenient 2 track work. I'd expect to have to put together a raid array
>to handle 8 track in the same style.
>
>Interesting anyway.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
> 
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>
>
>
>



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU