Subject: | Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion |
---|---|
From: | Walter Knapp <> |
Date: | Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:48:53 -0500 |
Klas Strandberg wrote: > > The membrane of a omni faces "nothing", except "vacuum". There is no air > behind it. The back is closed, or has a "can" behind which size is tuned so > that it "helps" the membrane moving, still maintaining a "flat" frequency > curve. The Omni's I've examined were sealed, but did not have a vacuum. They all seemed to be at normal pressure behind. In fact, some were vented, though not presumably enough to let sound vibration in. How widespread is using a true vacuum behind? Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion, Klas Strandberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU