naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion

Subject: Re: Soundscape Recordings, mic conversion
From: Klas Strandberg <>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 15:37:54 +0100
Sorry, a language problem here - vacuum is the wrong word, I just mean that
there is no resonance volume behind the membrane, or a tuned resonance volume. 

Klas.

ehAt 23:48 2002-02-08 -0500, you wrote:
>Klas Strandberg wrote:
>> 
>> The membrane of a omni faces "nothing", except "vacuum". There is no air
>> behind it. The back is closed, or has a "can" behind which size is tuned so
>> that it "helps" the membrane moving, still maintaining a "flat" frequency
>> curve.
>
>The Omni's I've examined were sealed, but did not have a vacuum. They
>all seemed to be at normal pressure behind. In fact, some were vented,
>though not presumably enough to let sound vibration in. 
>
>How widespread is using a true vacuum behind?
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
> 
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>
>
>
This outgoing e-mail is scanned for viruses with Norton 2002

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
       



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU