I think Black-backed is fitting for at least the male.
Shorty
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 11:04 AM Steve Read via Canberrabirds <> wrote:
Or perhaps Dubious Bittern? After all, the Latin name is (now)
Botaurus dubius.
And that name may be fitting if (as Wikipedia says, although I could not find a convincing source for this) molecular evidence has it more closely related to the Yellow Bittern
(Botaurus sinensis) than to the African and Palaearctic forms of the Little Bittern (Botaurus minutus). If that’s correct, we could also consider Australian Yellow Bittern or even Little Yellow Bittern…! As Geoffrey originally noted, the black
back is not a particularly characteristic feature in any case.
Steve
From: Canberrabirds <>
On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty via Canberrabirds
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2025 7:50 PM
To: Anthony Overs <>
Cc: CanberraBirds email list <>
Subject: Re: [Canberrabirds] FW: Maybe we should call it Tiny Bittern :)
Itsy, bitsy, teeny weeny little polka dot Bittern?
On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 at 19:41, Anthony Overs via Canberrabirds <> wrote:
Diminutive Bittern? Too quaint?
Puny Bittern? A bit mean?
Wee Bittern? Too Scottish?
On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 at 18:34, Geoffrey Dabb via Canberrabirds <> wrote:
Yes Philip. A few Tinys out there. I would spare our readers (if any), except these two recent explanations of changes in the IOC list are irresistible
‘Change English name of Tyranneutes stolzmanni, a manakin, from Dwarf Tyranneutes to Dwarf Tyrant-Manakin
Change English name of Tyranneutes virescens, a manakin, from Tiny Tyranneutes to Tiny Tyrant-Manakin’
These are the folk who say taxonomic accuracy is not an important issue with English names.
From: Canberrabirds <>
On Behalf Of Philip Veerman via Canberrabirds
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2025 5:18 PM
To: 'CanberraBirds email list' <>
Subject: Re: [Canberrabirds] FW: Maybe we should call it Tiny Bittern :)
How many Leasts, Littles, Lessers, Dwarfs, somethings bird names are there? Plus Fairy, which probably meant the same thing? I am not aware of a Tiny. Several
of the opposite too; Greats, Greaters, Giants, I don’t think we will ever get a fully accurate and appealing set of names, with so fe new words and so many birds.
From: Canberrabirds
On Behalf Of Geoffrey Dabb via Canberrabirds
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2025 10:22 AM
To: Canberrabirds
Subject: [Canberrabirds] FW: Maybe we should call it Tiny Bittern :)
Maybe, Shorty, but that is not a comparative label, and an American relative has claimed the title ‘Least Bittern’. Cornell Lab Birds of the World gives our chap as 59-120g, which is from HANZAB 1990 which
gives mean of that sample as 83.9g (all Sept-Mar). Pretty old information- It seems bittern-weighing has fallen from fashion, with so many other attractions for young people these days.. Cornell’s mean for male Least Bittern is 78.2g. I haven’t checked
other species in group. All pretty small birds though. That Australasian Grebe paddling past the ALB is 100-230g. It would lose the stretched-length competition, though.
From: Canberrabirds <>
On Behalf Of shorty via Canberrabirds
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2025 6:11 PM
To: Canberra birds <>
Subject: [Canberrabirds] Maybe we should call it Tiny Bittern :)
Catching plenty of Dragonflies this afternoon.
--
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
Emails posted to the list that exceed 2 MB (2,000 kB) in size, including attachments, will be rejected.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds. It is a condition of list membership that you agree to your contributions being archived.
Canberrabirds mailing list
https://lists.canberrabirds.org.au/mailman/listinfo/canberrabirds
--
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
Emails posted to the list that exceed 2 MB (2,000 kB) in size, including attachments, will be rejected.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds. It is a condition of list membership that you agree to your contributions being archived.
Canberrabirds mailing list
https://lists.canberrabirds.org.au/mailman/listinfo/canberrabirds
--
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
Emails posted to the list that exceed 2 MB (2,000 kB) in size, including attachments, will be rejected.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds. It is a condition of list membership that you agree to your contributions being archived.
Canberrabirds mailing list
https://lists.canberrabirds.org.au/mailman/listinfo/canberrabirds
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information. If you believe you have received this email or any of its contents in error, please notify me immediately by return
email and destroy this email. Do not use, disseminate, forward, print or copy any contents of an email received in error.
Attachment:
Description: bit-.JPG
ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt
|
