canberrabirds

Faunal emblem for the ACT

To: "" <>
Subject: Faunal emblem for the ACT
From: Philip Veerman <>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:12:31 +0000

Geoff included the arachnids, only among the etc. I am waiting for Stuart Harris to suggest his Peacock Spider.

 

Mark wrote: “It is about time that people like Andrew Barr  and all ACT politicians took note and thought outside the box and used a bit of initiative for a change – why not have some other animal as the ACT’s animal emblem.”

Well I think we see why it is such an open ended question.

 

Philip

 

From: Geoffrey Dabb [
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December, 2017 5:28 PM
To:
Subject: FW: [canberrabirds] Faunal emblem for the ACT

 

The confusion among potential emblem-proposers is quite understandable.  It has not been explained why the ACT should have a mammal emblem just because other jurisdictions have decided they need a mammal emblem.  About 20  years ago the ACT govt decided it needed a ‘faunal emblem’ and the debate centred around the Gang-gang, the Corroboree Frog and, as I recall, a third candidate that might have been the Earless Dragon or Golden Sun Moth.  All done then I’d hoped.  But no,  we now need a mammal emblem as well.  Do not suppose for a moment that that will be the end of it.

 

As I see it, our emblems are at different levels.  The Gang-gang is THE FAUNAL EMBLEM.  Any other favourite members of the natural world, from whatever category, will be in the nature of sub-emblems.    To lend some order to a rather chaotic process, I offer the below diagram.  It would have been so much better, when the original debate took place, if the Chief Minister had said:  “Fellow Canberrans, we are about to embark on a search for our faunal emblem.   Let us approach this in a logical fashion that recognises that there are all kinds of creatures out there and we all have our likes and dislikes.  First by the end of next month I would like to have a settled preference for (a) a vertebrate or (b) an invertebrate.  If, each month, we calmly and sensibly choose our route past each evolutionary fork we shall, I calculate, have reached a suitable ACT FAUNAL EMBLEM by March next year.  If you wish, each non-preferred fork can be given the rank of sub-emblem to avoid having to make a similar journey on a future occasion. May I give the example ‘Invertebrate Emblem’ without in any way wishing to prejudge the route our steps might take.”

 

 

     

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU