canberrabirds

RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia

To: 'John Bundock' <>, 'CanberraBirds' <>
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia
From: Philip Veerman <>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:20:59 +0000

That poem is a variant of the one at the start of Penny’s article.

 

In the last few years of (founder cogites) Steve & Nonie Wilson, I often visited them and they had a big collection of owl figurines.

 

Yes my question about Feather-tailed Gliders intended a distinction between Canberra and ACT forest habitats.

 

Philip

 

From: John Bundock [
Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2016 1:22 PM
To: 'John Bundock'; 'Philip Veerman'; 'Mark Clayton'; 'David McDonald (personal)'; 'CanberraBirds'
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia

 

My mother’s owl.

 

                This wise old Owl lived in an Oak

                The more he saw the less he spoke

                The less he spoke the more he heard

                Let’s emulate this wise old Bird

 

John Bundock

0400249429

 

From: John Bundock [
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2016 1:05 PM
To: 'Philip Veerman'; 'Mark Clayton'; 'David McDonald (personal)'; 'CanberraBirds'
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia

 

A feather glider has been reported in Namadgi but it’s unlikely to be found in Canberra. Susan Trost had pellets of Powl for 2015 examined. Sugar gliders were by far the most common mammalian prey, followed by ringtails. It picked up a few young brushtails in spring, when they would have been easy pickings when travelling on their mothers’ backs. I don’t know of any reason to suppose the ringtails were young ones. Unsurprisingly, no feather glider remains were reported.

 

John Bundock

0400249429

 

From: Philip Veerman
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2016 11:34 AM
To: 'Mark Clayton'; 'David McDonald (personal)'; 'CanberraBirds'
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia

 

Yes I thought so too.......... Do we even have any Feather-tailed Gliders in Canberra? And some of the Ringtail Possum were not young ones.

 

And using the word “family” to distinguish owls & nightjars, rather than to use the correct word “order”. As in “Frogmouths and nightjars are often mistaken for owls but, while they do have some similarities in appearance and habits, they belong to a different family of birds.”  More than that they belong to a different order of birds.

 

Yes why no picture of our bird?

 

It also forgot to tell the story of the ANU sports club that named their mascot (or emblem) after “Powl”, issuing a statement to that effect but in doing so they clearly used a picture of an Eagle Owl from the northern Hemisphere as the model for their artwork.

 

Philip

 

From: Mark Clayton
Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2016 11:19 AM
To: 'Philip Veerman'; 'David McDonald (personal)'; 'CanberraBirds'
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Symb–OWL–ism | National Library of Australia

 

Penny has made one mistake in her list of prey items – a Feather-tailed Glider would disappear in one beakful!! The species that Penny should have written was Sugar Glider.

 

Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU