canberrabirds

Re: FW: [canberrabirds] Feeney and Langmore on Campbell Park research on

To: Geoffrey Dabb <>
Subject: Re: FW: [canberrabirds] Feeney and Langmore on Campbell Park research on wrens and cuckoos
From: Martin Butterfield <>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:47:28 +1000
I thought a plastic defence was something employed by seabirds to overcome shopping bags!

Martin


On 8 April 2015 at 09:44, Geoffrey Dabb <> wrote:

 

From: John Bundock [mailto:m("homemail.com.au","j.bundock");" target="_blank">]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2015 9:22 AM
To: 'David Rees'; 'Robin Hide'; m("canberrabirds.org.au","canberrabirds");" target="_blank">
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Feeney and Langmore on Campbell Park research on wrens and cuckoos

 

Thanks for your translation David. I think I now understand what Feeney and Langmore were trying to convey. Their abstract suggests that the paper is one that, for the general reader, will be half read and a quarter understood.

 

John Bundock

 

From: David Rees [m("gmail.com","dprbirdlist");" target="_blank">]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2015 8:41 AM
To: Robin Hide; <m("canberrabirds.org.au","canberrabirds");" target="_blank">>
Subject: Re: [canberrabirds] Feeney and Langmore on Campbell Park research on wrens and cuckoos

 

Robin

 

I'm sure the work is fine, but reading such an abstract it is clear to me what gives so much modern science a bad name.

 

As an example, why don't we have a competition to replace '...have a plastic defense portfolio that can be acquired rapidly and deployed facultatively' with something that approaches what one might call English!  The military would have been proud of those words, these are fairy wrens!  

 

How about  '...wrens can quickly and flexibly change their behaviour to defend their nests from Cuckoos' .

 

I am sure others can do better.

 

Regards

 

David

 

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Robin Hide <m("anu.edu.au","robin.hide");" target="_blank">> wrote:

This new paper reporting Campbell Park research may be of interest to some list members-

 

Feeney, William. E. and Naomi E. Langmore (2015). “Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) increase vigilance near their nest with the perceived risk of brood parasitism.” The Auk 132(2): 359-364.

Abstract: Brood parasites typically impose costs on their hosts, which select for host defenses. However, where defenses are costly, hosts can benefit by facultative _expression_ of defenses in relation to the risk of parasitism. The results of our model-presentation experiments show that Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) mediate vigilance around their nest according to their perceived risk of brood parasitism; when the risk of parasitism is high, they increase the time they spend in the vicinity of their nests. In combination with previous studies, these data suggest that Superb Fairy-wrens have a plastic defense portfolio that can be acquired rapidly and deployed facultatively to prevent parasitism while minimizing wasteful investment in defenses in the absence of parasitism.

 

William E. Feeney1,2* and Naomi E. Langmore1

1Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

2Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

 

*Corresponding author: m("gmail.com","william.e.feeney");" target="_blank">

 

Robin Hide

 

 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU