Woodswallows at New Line Paddock

["Wallaces" <>]

See last two columns. However, records which are classified as breeding, without any indication if it was a nest or not, have been excluded so the last two columns are probably an underestimate. Also, the data is for the whole of the COG dataset which includes the Garden Bird Survey.

 

Steve

	Number of sighting only records	Number of breeding records	Total number of records	Percent breeding records	Number of years with records	Number of years with breeding records	Breeding records as percent of years with records	Number of nest breeding records	Nest breeding records as percent of records
Species
Dusky Woodswallow	5336	629	5965	10.5%	32	31	96.9%	314	5.3%
Masked Woodswallow	140	3	143	2.1%	22	3	13.6%	2	1.4%
White-browed Woodswallow	414	89	503	17.7%	28	13	46.4%	52	10.3%

 

 

From: Martin Butterfield [
Sent: Sunday, 10 November 2013 5:11 PM
To: Wallaces
Cc: COG List
Subject: Re: [canberrabirds] Woodswallows at New Line Paddock

 

Steve

 

Can you separate the breeding records into the nest found records (combination of ON, NE, NY) and others?  The proportion of breeding records seems notably higher than average for these species. 

 

Martin

 

On 10 November 2013 17:04, Wallaces <> wrote:

Some information on woodswallow breeding from the COG database.

 

Steve

 

	Number of sighting only records	Number of breeding records	Total number of records	Percent breeding records	Number of years with records	Number of years with breeding records	Number of years with breeding records as percent of years with records
Species
Dusky Woodswallow	5336	629	5965	11%	32	31	97%
Masked Woodswallow	140	3	143	2%	22	3	14%
White-browed Woodswallow	414	89	503	18%	28	13	46%

 

 

 

 

 

--
Martin Butterfield

http://franmart.blogspot.com.au/