Brown Treecreeper reporting rate and the overloaded map

[martin butterfield <>]

Steve

I think the Brown Treecreeper one works pretty well although there is too much junk in the background.  I would get rid of all the roads, Lakes and names of things.  (In the Magpie examples it is all illegible anyway.)  The outline of the ACT and the grid gives enough navigational information to work out the broad area.

Of the two Magpie examples I prefer the second one as a graphic presentation.  

Martin

On 17 September 2012 18:32, wallaces <> wrote:

Based on the replies I got (thanks again), I have reduced the warning to a single category (1-5 sheets) as it is the caution about using the data that is important and produced 3 different presentations.  In the linked document, I have included Brown Treecreeper and Australian Magpie (the most reported species) in the first presentation but only included the Australian Magpie in the other two presentations. Which, if any, do people prefer?

 

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B7cBqe3MzqSXWjFWUXhWcFBoc0U

 

 

Steve