Despite
the temptation of “inequitous”, Con, I shall resist the temptation to revert to
the matter of horse-gates. I agree there are currawongs and
currawongs. As an occasional (gasp) currawong feeder, I can separate our
resident pair from the transient gangs of presumed young birds from the hills.
Curiously
’larrikin’ has bird associations, of course. One theory is that
LARRIKIN = LARKIN’ = SKYLARKING = FROLICKING.
g
From: Con Boekel [ Sent: Saturday, 31
March 2012 3:32 PM To:
Subject: Re: [canberrabirds] Ritual
behaviour with Currawongs?
It is inequitous to call an entire species 'larrikins'. The
better-behaved currawongs are larrikins. The rest are ratbags.
Con
On
31/03/2012 11:38 AM, martin butterfield wrote:
Is it possible to define an
entire species as 'larrikin"?
Martin
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Con Boekel <> wrote:
David
If I were to be anthropomorphic, I would be thinking
that it is the larrikin element.
The same sort of thing is happening around
Turner.
Con
On 31/03/2012 9:59 AM, David Nicholls
wrote:
Winter approaching as it is, the
Currawongs are getting restless. This morning (western end of Deakin) they
are particularly active and noisy. In my immediate area there must be 50
or more, darting between trees, calling continuously, chasing each other, flying
about carrying bits of twig or leaf, and chasing (and being chased by) CS
cockatoos (which are otherwise feeding on the Liquidamber
seeds).
Apparently pointless but presumably has some social or ritual
value? Is this behaviour
explained?
DN