Hi Julian,
I suggest that observations like that are worth
noting, so you shouldn't doubt that aspect. I haven't looked at your photos but
yes I'd say that is a slow process relative to the usual for birds. The issue is
though that single ad hoc observations are hard to use in a publication sense
until they have several repeats and thus a context in which to use them. My
example of that from personal observation comes from the Regent Honeyeater vocal
mimicry in which I first observed it in 1974 and when I realised it was
something odd (much later), researched it and the relevant literature
extensively and got a heap of other observations and built up a case for
publication, that happened in 1992 and updated in 1994. Of course that was
something much more odd than long mating processes but builds up a case as to
how to get something published. Of course it doesn't need to be that slow, but
AFO probably wants something more than just one observation - though you might
be lucky.
You are welcome to visit me and consult my HANZAB
if it helps. I would also observe that the set of what references are cited in
HANZAB and what are not is notably peculiar and inconsistent, largely due to the
workload of whoever was compiling what species and what was available at the
time..
Philip
|
Admin
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email
.
If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address:
andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
|