Hi Paul,
Well done.
The inclusion of curves, rather than lines, adds a
new, probably good dimension, that is worthy of contemplation. Even if those
curves can change at any time. Your point about the Starling as below is also
correct. I can add something in that I would prefer to explain it rather than
just omit the extreme result (even though it was so long ago it hardly matters
now.) The high number was substantially due to one Site (Ross
Bennett's at Arawang) where there was a huge flock of Starlings around the horse
agistment yard beside his house for most of the year, until the Pyracantha
bushes were cut down. This is already fully explained in the GBS Report. Indeed
I used almost the same exclusion as you did, for getting around that one
aspect of that particular outlier result.
Long term COG members may recall that in the mid
1980s the NCDC (or whatever bureaucracy it was at the time) was so concerned
about the huge flocks of Starlings that it contracted COG to do a study of the
movements of Starling flocks around Canberra. This was subcontracted out to
Isabel Crawford who finished it and put out a report on the survey. David
Purchase had an input by reviewing Isabel's work. I have copies of both but I
suppose COG should have the originals if anyone is
interested.
Philip
|
Admin
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email
.
If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address:
andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
|