This is all very interesting
At work I have a 1 meg down load width and
at home a half a meg a minute down load (dial up) and while it may be a bit
slow at home there never seem to be any real issues.
Some time it is the time of day to.
I do run anti spam at home so do not get
most of the rubbish
Any way I enjoy it all
Cheers
John Cummings
CWC Coordinator NSW
A: 219 London Circuit Civic ACT 2600
E:
P: (02) 6230 0182
F: (02) 6230 0181
M: 0407 181 002
W: www.missionaustralia.com.au
Our Values - Compassion
Integrity Respect
Perseverance Celebration
Our Vision - To see a fairer Australia
by enabling people in need to find pathways to a better life.
Please consider the environment before printing
this email
From:
stephen mugford [
Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2007
6:19 PM
To: 'Philip Veerman'; 'Phyl
Goddard';
Subject: [canberrabirds] RE: large
attachments
Philip’s suggestion about screening
is a good one for many purposes. However, in my case I am running a business
and Outlook is on all day, routinely sweeping and downloading every 10 mins
while I work. I commonly get double figures of messages every day, leaving
aside spam (which CloudMark™ dumps into a spam folder) and this
site which I direct into a separate folder to examine a couple of times a day.
Hence my concern about large attachments
which can sometimes really choke up my download processes.
That said, I really appreciated Ian Fraser
posting the reminder and I hope we can stick to this without hurting
anyone’s feelings. I know people who post always do so with the best of
intentions. It is just that sometimes it is easy to forget, if your server is
(e.g.) a public sector dept with fast broadband, that something like 4 MB might
unintentionally cause somebody else real grief. J
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------
Dr Stephen Mugford
Managing Director
QQSR
PO Box 12
Gungahlin, ACT 2912,
AUSTRALIA
Ph:
+61 2 6242-1008
Mob:
+61 411 466640
From:
Philip Veerman [
Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2007
5:11 PM
To: Phyl Goddard; 'stephen
mugford';
Subject: large attachments
I have developed the habit of looking at the e-mails
through a mail reader first, without retrieving all the messages. That way I
delete spam, most messages with big attachments and things I'm not interested
in, before receiving them. As for the ‘blind kookaburra’ attachment, my attitude is if
someone just writes about a ‘blind in one eye kookaburra’ or
whatever it is, I am willing to just believe it without needing to see a photo.
I request people to use a way to compress large attachments or consider
carefully about that it may clog up someone's system for 20 minutes, whilst
being received and consider whether they will appreciate that.
