David,
I tend to mostly agree with you but offer these
thoughts. The answers will not always be the same for each family. In terms of
chick survival, either way it doesn't matter much, the species is so abundant
that any chick mortality will be less than the annual road toll. According to
GBS results the magpie is our most stable species both long term and monthly.
See also the book "Magpie Alert" by Darryl Jones (reviewed by me in CBN) or
the one by Gisela Kaplan (although reviews of that book are very negative). I
think the answers to your questions mostly will be: 1 Yes. 2 Continue as if he
was the parent (magpies aren't lions) 3 That varies a lot according to the age
and number of the nestlings and the quality of the habitat. However I think that
the actual important question, given the intent of the action is: If the
aggressive male is removed will the likely new male be as bad or worse as its
predecessor in terms of attacks on humans? I see no reason to think it likely
that the new bird would be less of a problem, so in many cases removal may
not help. I still wonder whether aggression by males is influenced by the
behaviour of the female.
Philip
|
Admin
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email
.
If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address:
andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
|