Thanks John & Barbara, I had forgotten about
that one. It reinforces what I wrote on this line yesterday. If this variant is
controlled by genes at just one or two loci and the allele(s) for the variant is
(are) a recessive gene(s), present at low population levels, then it is entirely
reasonable that, especially with a bit of inbreeding, the character will
show up every now and then in smallish populations like we have here. The bird
reported by Nicola Clark at Uni of Canberra could easily be ancestral to or
related to the ones reported by Terry some years later. The only change I would
offer to what I wrote on this line yesterday is that there is not even the need
for a recent Canberra based mutation. If the gene is already in the population
as a recessive gene present at low population level, it will inevitably show up
(provided it isn't harmful). Where that phenotype is the standard form
(presumably in Italy), it would probably be so because the other allele does not
occur there. The article by Nicola Clark was well put together and pointed out
some of the other obvious differences between House Sparrows and Tree Sparrows.
Philip
|
Admin
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email
.
If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address:
andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
|