dotterel or plover

To: <>
Subject: dotterel or plover
From: "Geoffrey Dabb" <>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:33:50 +1000
This one is even more confusing than Philip indicated.  The 1969 CSIRO list (a catalogue of names then in use) gave 'Dotterel' with no mention of  'Plover'.  The 1978 recs, as PV says, and for the reason given, favoured 'Plover', although every one of the 9 Aust refs cited had 'Dotterel'.   In 1993, after the '78 recs had been hanging in the air for many years, HANZAB came out with 'Plover' and under 'other names' does not mention 'Dotterel' except as a name used in 'NZ' (!).  When C&B explained their departures from the 78 recs, they said 'Dotterel' was preferred as a change to the 78 names being one of those names 'that were thought to be unpopular and have been changed after survey'.  This email, and indeed life itself, is too short for further comment on the aforementioned 'survey'.
Now on more important matters, Roger.
(1)  In your early postings, you said you liked to use the old bird names that were familiar to you.  What has happened to that free spirit?  Put another way, how long have you been in Canberra now?
(2)  It is already raining.
(3)  Even if it were not, this bird often lurks on completely dry roadways.
(4)  How do you know it's a 'he'?
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU