I don't feel strongly about this, though I've commented in the past that the
big dam has the potential to be as significant a wetland as Jerra,
especially given the airport constraints on improving Jerra. For instance
the standing dead trees at Mullies provide breeding options not available at
Jerra.
Both are of course artificial, but we don't let that detract from how we
value Jerra; I'd see them both as part compensation for all the wetlands
we've destroyed.
However, I think that the key point is that the decision on the dam must be
made in its own right, while considering any negative impacts on the
woodland species. Those species don't need it and won't benefit from it.
Anyway, just a thought.
cheers
Ian
---
Ian Fraser,
Environment Tours; Vertego Environmental Wordsmithing
GPO Box 3268, Canberra, ACT 2601
ph: 02 6249 1560 fax: 02 6247 3227
---
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.5/32 - Release Date: 27 Jun 05
*******************************************************************************************************
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>
List-Subscribe: <>
List archive: <http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds>
List manager: David McDonald, phone (02) 6231 8904; email
<>
|
