Thanks for your reply. It will be interesting to see how the Night Parrot
situation pans out. Your experiences are very useful information, so thank
My concerns about call-playback were stimulated by a local (Clarence Valley,
NSW) Ecologist and Birding-wildlife Guide, who is conducting call-playback
and spotlighting tours for 4 Threatened species of Owl, in the middle of
their breeding season. I suspect he will also suggest professional jealousy
on my part, regarding that issue. Strangely, he is choosing to conduct his
tours away from tourist centres such as Coffs Harbour & Yamba, closest to
him, and compete with our conservation business instead! So we have no
business competition other than the local birding guide, who claims to be a
conservationist. Stranger than fiction! :-)
We're currently applying for a NSW Nat Parks Ecopass, and will be joining
WTA as a part of that. I hope to be in touch with that soon.
I've also recently approached Birdlife Australia, to ally ourselves and
provide an avenue to recruit more members, and give discounts. I've not
heard back yet.
Hoping to hear Masked Owl fledglings soon, their nest tree is close by, and
I'm looking forward to any noises coming from that direction. :-)
From: Denise Goodfellow
Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2013 1:04 PM
To: Simon Clayton; Birding Aus
Cc: Ronda Green BSc(Hons)
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Night Parrot Interview this morning
Some tour operators do behave badly, as happened with the Red Goshawk at
Mataranka. I know from experience (30 years as a birding/natural history
guide) that Tourism NT promoted any operator who ran bird tours no matter
how little experience they had or what they did to show clients birds. As
long as they had the right permits, public liability insurance and were
'accredited' they were taken on board. On raising issues of bad behaviour
I was accused of professional jealousy.
However, private individuals appear to be a bigger problem, as with the
Goshawk, and also at Leanyer Sewage Ponds - there the manager was so upset
by the behaviour of some that he threatened to have any birder found in
there without a permit, arrested.
American birders involved in my PhD research sometimes mentioned a dislike
of guides who disturbed birds. But again, in the opinion of respondents
(who included some of the US's top birders) private individuals were more
often the problem, and in particular photographers. Interestingly the main
reason given for disliking photographers was not the welfare of the birds
they disturbed, but that they could prevent a birder from seeing a target
Conservation is not a top priority for some really serious listers (I don't
have time at the moment to dig up the research on this, but it is around).
Indeed, the American Birding Association was founded by birders more
interested in the activity as competition and 'sport'.
The ABA is now promoting conservation as are many other birding
organisations all over the world. Yet some birders will join an organisation
that promotes conservation, and even donate to such causes. However, their
desire to "collect" a target species can over-ride all sense of what's right
(and safe, in some instances). And that goes for some guides as well.
One couple (again PhD respondents) reported that on a South American trip
they left a guide and his other clients who spent hours bashing bushes in
the hope of seeing one particular species.
Other guides or tour operators will go along with whatever their client
wants. A pet hate of American respondents who were not mad keen listers was
guides who bowed to the wishes of clients who would do anything to see a
bird. So when training Indigenous relatives in Arnhem Land as
birding/natural history guides I ran a course on how to deal with
inappropriate behaviour by clients (and tour operators), and that included
birders or photographers likely to pressure them to chase particular
species. However, because of the difficulty some were likely to encounter
dealing with such people, I excluded them as a market.
As long as there are listers with the resources and the obsession, the
welfare of birds will run a poor second to the 'list'.
Denise Lawungkurr Goodfellow
PO Box 71, Darwin River,
043 8650 835
PhD candidate, SCU
Vice-chair, Wildlife Tourism Australia
Nominated for the Condé Nast international ecotourism award, 2004 by the
American website, Earthfoot.
Wildlife Adviser, BBC¹s ŒDeadly 60¹
On 3/7/13 4:36 PM, "Simon Clayton" <> wrote:
> Hi David,
> I agree with your approach to bird conservation & tourism for sought after
> species. The welfare of the bird must come first, particularly with
> Threatened species. Good points
> I think most birders are prepared to pay to view a bird, for the habitat
> conservation of the rare species they may see, it may well be beneficial
> the species & associated ecosystems.
> Unfortunately, some tourism operators do use call-playback, spotlighting
> other disturbance during the breeding season of threatened species, for
> profit, without the welfare of the birds in mind.
> As a birding tourism business, we don't use call-playback, or
> Night vision equipment is becoming more affordable, and disturbs the fauna
> less, and we are having success with this viewing Masked Owls here,
> other fauna. Hopefully any money from those prepared to pay to see Night
> Parrot, will support their conservation by doing it responsibly.
> Simon Clayton
> Birdrangers, Gibraltar Reserve
> Cangai, NSW, 2460
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)