birding-aus

Thesis topic #2308 - Peckers vs Scratchers

To: Peter Shute <>
Subject: Thesis topic #2308 - Peckers vs Scratchers
From: Laurie Knight <>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:29:02 +1000
G'day Peter,

Very few of the BBR I have seen have been foraging in mud. BBR seem to be the least water dependent of all the rails in Australia. They seem to be quite at home in thick grasses and garden beds.

The BBR on islands that are free of surface fresh water are an interesting group. I have seen them foraging on tidal flats as well as the grassy "paddock" on the West Island of Ashmore Reef and happily poking about the rainforest resort of Green Island (east of Cairns).

Parrots have a varied diet, but many of them have the ability and inclination to use their feet when feeding.

Laurie.


On 16/05/2013, at 6:33 AM, Peter Shute wrote:

In the case of the BBR, perhaps it spends so much time foraging in mud, where the bill works better, compared to the time it forages in litter that it's not worth working out a better way.

If it changed methods then it would have to change habitat, and then it might not be a BBR anymore. So what's stopping it? And what's stopping it from learning to scratch while retaining the ability to probe? Perhaps it actually does quite well with its bill in the litter.

Are there any birds that probe and scratch?

Peter Shute

Sent from my iPad

On 16/05/2013, at 6:06 AM, "Laurie Knight" <> wrote:

That's part of it, but there is more to it than that.  A species can
occupy multiple ecological niches across its range, and different
species occupying the same niche can behave quite differently.

I think their ancestral history has a fair bit to do with it.

Laurie.


On 15/05/2013, at 10:29 PM, Carl Clifford wrote:

Laurie,

To each their ecological niche.

Carl Clifford

On 15/05/2013, at 22:07, Laurie Knight <>
wrote:

I came across a foraging Buff-banded Rail as I was passing through
the Roma St Parklands yesterday.  Whereas a Junglefowl, Scrubfowl,
Turkey or Logrunner would be busily scratching away in the leaf
litter, the BBR was using its bill to fossick for food in a flower
bed.

This got me thinking about the nature of ground-feeding species
that forage with their feet vs species that forage exclusively with
their bills.

I suspect there are few examples of shorebirds that use their feet
to uncover food (I've seen a gull paddling its feet on the water's
edge but that's pretty much an exception).  In contrast, a number
of dryland birds are very dependent on their feet to uncover food.
The thing about the BBR was that it was foraging with its bill in a
medium that other species would use their feet to clear.

So what is it that sets the programming for ground-feeding
behaviour?  Some shorebird species would seem to have feet that
could be used for foraging ...

Regards, Laurie.
===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================


===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU