I would think they are suggesting that once people start shooting
anywhere they are liable to shoot anything.
I know there are responsible shooters out there, but unfortunately there
are also a number (I won't speculate as to how many) who have little or
no concern about what they fire at. Recent data from the duck hunting
saga, some of whom reportedly even shot Black Swans, would suggest that
anything is seen as fair game by some.
If you can't tell a Black Swan from a Black Duck, I would suggest you
shouldn't even be allowed out, never mind allowed carry a fire arm.
But then again, that's just my opinion......
and I'm not trying to start up another thread here - just thought I'd
offer readers an option to contribute. Not really interested in
commenting further to be honest, as I only get a little excited and, at
my age, that's detrimental to my mental capacity.......
Cheers
Colin
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012, at 05:08 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
> I'm not in favour of hunting in national parks, but are they suggesting
> people will shoot flying foxes and bandicoots? Or are they talking about
> indirect effects?
>
> Peter Shute
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
|
