birding-aus

Birding-aus a forum?

To: Clair Wenborn <>, "" <>
Subject: Birding-aus a forum?
From: Peter Shute <>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:53:24 +1100
Firstly, I'd like to say that in its current form this list works ok.  Not 
perfect, but ok.

I don't know what you mean by "information ... being in one long, hard to read 
string in each email".  Are you referring to daily digest emails?  If so, can't 
you switch to individual emails?

In my opinion, digest mode is the cause of several problems we have.  Firstly, 
digest mode readers have difficulty replying, and often end up not quoting any 
of the material they're discussing, which can make it hard to follow the 
conversation, and sometimes put in a different subject line to the original 
email.

Those are the more visible problems.  A less visible problem is that if you 
don't reply to an individual email, the internal message-id of the email is 
different, so the archives thread it wrongly, or not at all.  It's quite common 
to search the archives, and find that not all the replies have been associated 
with the thread.  If you reply to an individual email, it gets threaded 
correctly even if you change the subject line.

Another problem is that digest readers have to scroll through every email to 
see which ones are worth reading.  It suspect this makes them grouchy whenever 
an uninteresting thread goes on too long.

I have used birding forums like birdforum.net.  While the grouping of threads 
into subforums is neat, sometimes it means that not many people read your 
messages, because there are simply too many subforums for everyone to read.  
That site has so many readers that this splitting is necessary, but this isn't 
true with birding-aus, the number of contributors is small enough for it all to 
be together, and we benefit from everyone reading everything.  There are times, 
of course, when the waffling can get a bit much, but they quickly pass.

In short, I'd say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".  I think digest mode is 
broke, and we'd benefit from getting rid of it, but I'm sure the people who use 
it have their reasons.  There is actually an alternative Australian birding 
forum, I forget the URL, but after it started, it seems most people preferred 
to stay with this list.

Peter Shute

Clair Wenborn wrote on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 12:26 PM:

> Hi All,
>
> I am wondering if it has ever been suggested that birding-aus change
> its format and become a forum? Readers of the digest could still
> receive posts as emails if they wished and the archives would be more
> searcher friendly.
> Information would be categorised together and easy to refer back to
> instead of being in one long, hard to read string in each email.
> Users can then read the categories and threads that they are
> interested in and save time instead of reading each subject heading.
> Security need not be an issue as the forum could be private and
> moderators would be able to see who is logging on. Or certain
> sections of the forum like locations and sightings could only be
> accessed by approved users. Of course it would be up to the list
> owner and the majority of users. Just a suggestion...what does
> everyone think?
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU