or use them as chum on a Pelagic. Now that would be a good carbon
offset.
On 02/01/2008, at 10:52 AM, Tony Russell wrote:
Send them to the USA? Or maybe Russia where the cold would slow the
process?
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Clifford
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:10 AM
To: Tony Russell
Cc: 'michael norris'; 'Alastair Smith'; 'BIRDING-AUS'
Subject: The Biggest Twitch - and Carbon
Probably the best thing that Carbon Nazis could do to assist in
reducing CO2 emissions is to stop breathing, but then there is the
problem with the CO2 emissions generated by bodily decomposition. Any
suggestions on solving this problem?
Carl Clifford
On 02/01/2008, at 10:29 AM, Tony Russell wrote:
I must say I agree with Alistair and Michael and Jill on this. Anyone
whose life becomes dictated by how much carbon usage they incur must be
either not very interested in the excitement and fun that birding travel
can provide, or so caught up in the carbon debate that they are unable
to see any other point of view. I'm not suggesting that the carbon
issue is of no importance, but crikey, we need some balance and need to
get a life in the meantime. Life is too short.
Tony.
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
