birding-aus
|
To: | "John Leonard" <>, "Birding-aus" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Calls and songs |
From: | "Philip Veerman" <> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Oct 2007 21:49:51 +1000 |
Sorry John but that is not right. Sometimes it is right, but (as with many parts of biology it is not that clear cut), there is a wide range of extents to which calls or song are innate or learned. The is a whole heap of literature about this and I am certainly not about to summarise that here. It is certainly not correct to say what you have put below. As for only passerines have song, non-passerines only have calls well that is a bit of circular reasoning. If you choose to use taxonomic grouping as part of the definition as to who sings then it is circular. It is true that generally passerines have more complex sounds that fit the song model. However the calls of cuckoos etc when arriving at breeding areas fit the function of song as a sexual and territorial marker. Alastair's comments are pretty good. Philip |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Tasmanian Oriole, John Tongue |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Tasmanian Oriole, Val Ford |
Previous by Thread: | Calls and songs, Tony Russell |
Next by Thread: | Yellow eared, fronted, throated and white-rumped miners., Pat OMalley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU