birding-aus

blackface

To: "Tim Low" <>
Subject: blackface
From: "Philip Veerman" <>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:31:17 +1000
Tim,
 
That is all very well but by "saying 'Here is an albatross', without naming the species", especially when there are several species of albatross showing on the TV at the same time but he is only talking about the Wandering Albatross, this fails to highlight biological diversity, as in the range of species in existence. Obviously that was not David Attenborough's intention, but it is one of the problems that leads to people using words like "big chicken hawk, little chicken hawk".
 
Let us face it, shuffling old words does not give enough options to cover all of biological diversity. To some people the most obvious thing about a BFCS is its black face, to others the shufflewing habit, to others the churring call. By all means invent new words. Someone at some stage invented the word Jabiru for Jabiru and "hawk". If you want, why not come up with "Blizle" for Buff-breasted Paradise Kingfisher or "Cranot" for Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike. Eventually all Cuckoo-shrikes could then be "Cranots". It will work brilliantly in a century or two when everyone is used to them and we can get rid of silly throwback words that link to unrelated European names for taxa. After all, "Blizle" and "Cranot" are no more intrinsically stupid than "Robin" and "Wren" and easier than the names we use. However in the meantime it will be awfully confusing and I would prefer to stick with the "official" recommended names.
 
Philip
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU