Claire S <>
Mike Owen <>
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:31:13 +1000
Claire S wrote:
Just wondering if the galah E. rosiecapillus kuhli is officially
recognised as a definate subspecies?
There has been a unusual amount of interest in this subspecies by
aviculturalists in the last month or two (people wanting to purchase
these birds). Published works I have read list only two subspecies and
either don't list the northern kuhli at all or say it is a probable but
unrecognised subspecies. Anyone know of DNA or other work that has been
completed or someone who can confirm the status of this subspecies?
If HANZAB is regarded as the official position then yes, kuhli is
recognised as a separate subspecies. Forshaw in his latest revision of
Australian Parrots (2002) also recognises kuhli as a separate subspecies.
Both sources note that the three subspecies of Galah could do with some
further work. I am not aware of DNA to the subspecies level with Galahs.
World Parrot Trust (Australia)
Birding-Aus is now on the Web at
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: