birding-aus Sydney Pelagic Selection Process

To: "birding-aus" <>
Subject: birding-aus Sydney Pelagic Selection Process
From: "Roger McGovern" <>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:44:29 +0800
It must have been Tony Palliser's remark in the February pelagic report about the "high quality" of birders on that trip, but I lay in bed at 2.00am in my Perth home the other night reminiscing about past pelagic trips and thinking about the possibility that selection for the trip, instead of being on the current 'first in, best dressed' basis be made on the basis of points scored and accumulated from past pelagics.
For example, anyone calling an Australian 'first' successfully might get credited 100 points, with a NSW 'first' scoring, say, 50 points. Pete (wasn't that a Murphy's) Milburn would be a great points scorer on this basis, with others not far behind. There would have to be some sorting out as Tony (it won't be accepted without a photograph) Palliser would add his note of caution to rare sightings. Picking a Manx Shearwater in a resting raft of 400 Hutton's would score very highly, and successfully explaining which one it is to the assembled watchers onboard could score 20 bonus points.
Confidently calling good birds as evidenced by, say, Rod (I'm sure I had a comb somewhere) Gardner (sorry Rod!) calling a Kerguelen Petrel at 1 km range in 4m seas, could score 20 points. And, of course, there could be negative points. Mistakenly calling a Southern Fulmar and giving Tony a heart attack would have to be minus 50. Explaining the finer points of secondary moult to someone who doesn't want to know, and is still trying to sort shearwaters from petrels, would be a minus 5. And doing the same thing to a Japanese visitor who only came to see whales and is desperately looking for a quiet spot to throw up, would be a minus 10.
Speaking of whales, some points should be awarded to the cetacean watchers such as Steve (long-finned pilot whales at 2 o'clock) Anyon-Smith, since they often brighten up some very flat spots in the birding. Mind you, Steve's habit of calling "Brown Cock-or twos at 9 o'clock" every time we come back into Sydney Harbour past the nudist beach, would have to earn him some serious deducts.
Equally during flat spots in the birding, 5 points could be earned in sharing with others the latest good stake-outs for terrestial birds such as where the Grey Honeyeater was most recently seen at Kunoth Bore. On one memorable pelagic, Tony was describing a good spot for Lewin's Rail and finished the description by saying "..and, if you just sit quietly, you can hear them coming."  The look on Tony's face when Steve asked him what a Lewin's Rail sounds like when it comes, would have been worth 20 bonus points!
On reflection, I would like to withdraw this suggestion of a selection process to get onto Sydney pelagics because I don't think that I would qualify. Leave it as it is Tony, and I look forward to rejoining you at the end of the year.
Roger McGovern
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • birding-aus Sydney Pelagic Selection Process, Roger McGovern <=

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU