birding-aus
|
To: | "'ozbird'" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | FW: Pizzey & Knight (part 5,703) |
From: | "Conole, Lawrie" <> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jul 1997 12:08:25 +1000 |
> A few days ago I sent the bit underneath to the list. Some friends > pointed out my confusion - of course the **Slater** swiftlets are the > proper shape, not the Simpson & Day. Invert the references to Slater > and S&D, and you get what I actually meant to say. So I revert to > being a harsh critic of S&D, and my cantankerous reputation is > preserved. > > (b) the swiftlets in Simpson & Day probably have the best "in flight" > jizz of the guides (yes I did say "best" in the same sentence as S&D); > Collocalia swiftlets are often rather paddle-shaped or spatula-shaped > in the wing department in flight, compared with the more > crescent-winged swifts-proper; P&K and Slater both make the swiftlets > a bit too "pointy-winged". > > > Lawrie Conole > Geelong, Victoria, Australia > > http://yarra.vicnet.net.au/~birdsaus/painted.html > http://www.xnet.com/~ugeiser/Birds/TripReports/JavaBali96.html > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Request for identification please, Rosemary Hope |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Birdwatching databases, Peter Woodall |
Previous by Thread: | Request for identification please, Rosemary Hope |
Next by Thread: | RE: Thornbill Gymnastics, WM James Davis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU