bioacoustics-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Bioacoustic Articles in Behaviour 147, 3

To: <>
Subject: Bioacoustic Articles in Behaviour 147, 3
From: "Frank Veit" <>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:17:45 +0100
Skierczynski, MS & TS Osiejuk (2010) Sharing songs within a local dialect does not hinder neighbourstranger discrimination in ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana) males. Behaviour 147: 333-351.
 
Lampe, HM, TJS Balsby, YO Espmark & TD Dabelsteen (2010) Does twitter song amplitude signal male arousal in redwings (Turdus iliacus)?
Behaviour 147: 353-365.
 
Hansen, BT, LE Johannessen & T Slagsvold (2010) Interspecific cross-fostering of great tits (Parus major) by blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) affects inter- and intraspecific communication. Behaviour 147: 413-424.
 
 
-------
 
Abstracts
 
 
Skierczynski, MS & TS Osiejuk (2010) Sharing songs within a local dialect does not hinder neighbourstranger discrimination in ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana) males. Behaviour 147: 333-351.
Neighbour-stranger (hereafter N-S) discrimination in birds is common and has most likely evolved to settle repeated disputes more efficiently and without physical fights. We tested whether an oscine bird, the ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana), with a small repertoire size from a population with a local dialect and a high level of song sharing is able to discriminate between the songs of neighbours and strangers. We performed playback experiments with eighteen males to measure the response to a repeated single rendition of a single song type derived randomly from a repertoire of a neighbour or stranger. Subjects responded more aggressively to the songs of strangers than neighbours (faster approach, more calls and songs uttered), suggesting that ortolan buntings can discriminate between the songs of neighbours and strangers. Our results also suggest that cues for N-S discrimination may be based on individual within-song type variation regardless of song-type repertoire composition. We contrast our results with an earlier study where ortolan buntings from a non-dialect population were tested. Finally, we predict a positive relationship between the level of song sharing and within-song type variation, which may be maintained by selection for N-S discrimination in songbirds with small and moderate repertoire sizes.
 
Lampe, HM, TJS Balsby, YO Espmark & TD Dabelsteen (2010) Does twitter song amplitude signal male arousal in redwings (Turdus iliacus)?
Behaviour 147: 353-365.
Bird songs may vary in amplitude for several reasons. Variations due to differences in environmental conditions are well known but whether signal information varies with song amplitude is less well known. In some species quiet songs are heard as a soft twitter. These twitter songs are common in Turdus species and may be used during escalated close range encounters when a quiet song will attract less attention from others. Male redwings (T. iliacus) sing a terminating twitter part that is quieter and highly variable both between and within males compared with the introductory motif part. The twitter song of redwings, however, is often louder than the twitter in other Turdus species, especially during escalated song encounters. The seasonal variation in twitter duration also suggests that the twitter may signal increased aggression. We tested how male redwings responded to an assumed escalation in signalling. In an interactive playback experiment we increased the amplitude of the twitter songs we played back in response to an increase in twitter duration by the subject. Males gave stronger responses to louder twitter. This suggests that twitter amplitude may signal arousal in male redwings.
 
Hansen, BT, LE Johannessen & T Slagsvold (2010) Interspecific cross-fostering of great tits (Parus major) by blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) affects inter- and intraspecific communication. Behaviour 147: 413-424.
Bird song is used to attract mates and deter rivals, and also functions as a species recognition cue. It is a flexible trait affected by learning, hence the choice of song tutors may affect an individuals' singing. By interspecifically cross-fostering great tits (Parus major) to blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) in the wild, we have manipulated the species recognition of great tits, which in turn has influenced their song. In the present study, we presented breeding great tit and blue tit control males with playback of the aberrant song of cross-fostered great tit males and playback of the normal song of control great tit males. Blue tit males responded more to cross-fostered than control great tit song while great tit males showed the inverse response pattern. This shows that interspecific cross-fostering may affect both inter- and intraspecific communication. However, the response of males of both species towards the song of cross-fostered great tit males was not of the same magnitude as the response towards ordinary blue tit song; thus, the real species identity is to some extent maintained in the aberrant song of cross-fostered males.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Bioacoustic Articles in Behaviour 147, 3, Frank Veit <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU