The voting resembles a bit the results of birds in back yards...not the surveys
but "peoples' choice". I think if it was only voted on by the so called
'birding community', the end tally would be a bit different - does that make
sense?
Cheers,
Peter Madvig
-----Original Message-----
From: Birding-Aus On Behalf Of Tom
Wilson
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2017 8:04 PM
To: Carl Clifford; Bill Stent
Cc:
Subject: Guardian Australian bird of the year 2017
Better than Channel-billed Cuckoo though. If you haven’t voted and don’t know
what to vote for, how about giving the OBP a boost?
From: Carl Clifford
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 6:10 PM
To: Bill Stent
Cc:
Subject: Guardian Australian bird of the year 2017
Poor old OBP hasn’t scored well.
On Monday, November 20, 2017, Bill Stent <> wrote:
> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/
> 2017/nov/20/australian-bird-of-the-year-2017-vote-for-your-favourite
>
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR> <javascript:;> <BR> To change
> settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR>
> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|
