Mike is right that it is not IOC, and this has implications for Australian
listers, who generally follow that taxonomy (referring to your comments
Michael).
See here for a good summary:
http://www.lynxeds.com/content/rare-bird-alert-andy-stoddart-17-february-2017
Mick
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 13:51, Mike Carter <> wrote:
>
> Michael, are you sure you're right about this? What is the publication date
> for the 'Birds of the World' that you are using? Lynx is strongly tied to
> BirdLife International who produce their own taxonomy often different and
> more conservative than that of the IOC (international Ornithological
> Congress).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike Carter, 03 5977 1262
> 181/160 Mornington-Tyabb Road
> Mornington, VIC 3931, Australia
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Birding-Aus On Behalf Of
> michael hunter
> Sent: 21 April 2017 12:07 PM
> To:
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Bird names
>
> Hi All.
>
> Following the Pitta name change posting I have been delving into
> Lynx’s “Birds of the World” in which the current IOC taxonomy is used.
>
> These are a quite fantastic two volumes, particularly for those bird
> when the travelling around the world. For instance we twitched the Big Island
> of Hawaii recently,( in conjunction with a Conference of course). The
> available books on Hawaiian birds are OK, but for an overview with pictures
> of the surviving and extinct species and their distribution, BotW puts
> everything into place.
>
> The big revelation for out of touch Australian twitchers like us is
> the number of new Australian species created over the past few years. We
> thought that we had seen them all except the NP and Princess Parrot, but now
> have to circumnavigate Australia again to mop up what were once subspecies
> but now fully fledged species, possibly up to a dozen or more. ( Any excuse.)
>
> Have not looked at the new Birds of Australia yet, will be interested
> to see their take on the new species.
>
> The BotW definition of “species” is explained in the fine print
> forward of (vol 2) Birds of the World. Although ultimately based on
> molecular studies, (which themselves are subject to variable interpretation),
> todays species seem to be defined as any discrete geographic population, with
> even minimal morphological differences, until proved otherwise.
>
> Australia’s one time Red-breasted Pitta, now Papuan Pitta , ssp
> digglesei, is apparently so close to the ssp on the adjacent mainland New
> Guinea, from where it is a seasonal migrant, that its subspecies status is
> suspect and subject to further scrutiny. Digglesei may disappear.
>
>
> Cheers Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR>
> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>
>
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR>
> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|
