That is a bit extreme to go as far as suggest it as possibly defamatory. The
sentence is clearly ambiguous (if that makes sense). What I wondered is who
is the "you" in: "Perhaps you could re-word the caption to read: Birds
killed in the 2013 Victorian duck shooting season - image by Debbie Lustig."
Philip
-----Original Message-----From: Birding-Aus
On Behalf Of John Harris
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2016 9:29 AM To: Peter Shute Cc:
Subject: Duck shooting carnage email
That may be so, but I would think that Debbie might consider it defamatory
as it would appear to read that she did the shooting........
Cheers
John Harris BASc, GDipEd
Director - Wildlife Experiences PL
Principal Ecologist/Zoologist
Croydon, Victoria
0409 090 955
On 23/03/2016 8:38 AM, "Peter Shute" <> wrote:
> She did get her shooting licence last year.
>
> Peter Shute
>
> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Birding-Aus
On Behalf
> > Of Carl Weber> > Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2016 1:20 PM> > To:
> > Subject: [Birding-Aus] Duck shooting carnage email
> >
> > Just received an email from BA re Duck Shooting Carnage.
> >
> > It contains a pic of slaughtered birds carrying the caption: Image of
> birds
> > killed in the 2013 Victorian duck shooting season by Debbie Lustig
> >
> > Some non birders could read this and conclude that it was Debbie that
did
> > the shooting.
> >
> >
> >
> > Perhaps you could re-word the caption to read: Birds killed in the 2013
> > Victorian duck shooting season - image by Debbie Lustig.
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|
