Well done me for leaving out the subject line. It should be as above.
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Apr 2015, at 2:54 pm, Peter Shute <> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if anyone here has access to the first British Birds article
> listed on this page:
> http://www.britishbirds.co.uk/article/british-birds-may-2012/
>
>
> Unfortunately only the abstract is listed there, but I'd like to track down
> the full article. This is the abstract:
> What the eye doesn't see: the prevalence of fraud in ornithology Andrew
> Harrop, Martin Collinson and Tim Melling broach one of the thorniest topics
> in birding. They suggest that there is a tendency to see examples of fraud in
> ornithology as rare aberrations. Their paper outlines some known and
> suspected historical examples of fraud, and argues that fraud of one kind or
> another has occurred more or less consistently, if uncommonly, in
> ornithology. Although most of the examples discussed are from Britain, it is
> likely that similar examples could be found in the archives of many nations.
> It is also likely that small-scale fraud continues today and is something
> that the ornithological community should be aware of. In particular, this has
> implications for the level of proof required by those assessing records of
> rarities.
>
> Peter Shute
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR>
> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|
