birding-aus

Sedentary v resident,

To: Lloyd Nielsen <>, "" <>
Subject: Sedentary v resident,
From: Kev Lobotomi <>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 00:22:52 +1000
Hi All
I guess if something is resident, then logically it would have to be sedentary, 
because it doesn't move (very far anyway!). Obviously they mean the same 
thing!-Kevin Bartram
 
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:13:18 +1000
> From: 
> To: 
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Sedentary v resident,
> 
> In the Ornithologists Dictionary by Johannes Erritzoe, Kaj Kampp, Kevin 
> Winker and our own Clifford B. Frith, (2007), it states -
> 
> Resident: nonmigratory, staying in the breeding area year-round. Also 
> called sedentary.
> 
> Sedentary: non-migratory, remaining in one general area throughout the 
> year; also called resident.
> 
> I have found that this is the best source by far for explanation of 
> ornithological terms. Lynx are the publishers.
> 
> Lloyd Nielsen
> Mt Molloy,  Nth Qld
> www.birdingaustralia.com.au
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Birding-Aus mailing list
> 
> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU