birding-aus
|
To: | 'Angus Innes' <>, Birding Aus <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Military training areas and Conservation - Unexploded Reality |
From: | Peter Shute <> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:05:21 +1000 |
All these examples of the ecological value of military land make me wonder if all that is needed to save some species is for them to be left alone. I would have thought that land set aside for military use might end up neglected and full of weeds. Is that the case, or does it not matter that much? I also wonder if this land tends to be of higher quality than national parks. I've read that national parks tend to be land that is unsuitable for settlement or agriculture anyway, and might therefore be of lesser value for many species. Peter Shute =============================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: http://birding-aus.org =============================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Military training areas and Conservation - Unexploded Reality, Angus Innes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Military training areas and Conservation - Unexploded Reality, Chris Corben |
Previous by Thread: | Military training areas and Conservation - Unexploded Reality, Angus Innes |
Next by Thread: | Military training areas and Conservation - Unexploded Reality, Chris Corben |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU