birding-aus

Fwd: Re: Slaughter of Australian Camels (Off Topic)

To: Tony Russel <>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Slaughter of Australian Camels (Off Topic)
From: Andrew Taylor <>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:32:26 +1000
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:14:37PM +0930, Tony Russel wrote:
> When burnt doesn't methane become just carbon dioxide and water ?  We should
> fit cattle and camels with afterburners and condensers.

Tony, your science is correct but don't expect to patent the concept we
already burn (flare) methane emissions from rubbish dumps & landfills
in some places where it is not practical to capture and use them.

Methane release into the atmosphere also finishes up as CO2+H20 over a
period of decades which is why methane is potent greenhouse gas only
on short timescales (our lifetimes).  CO2 remains in the atmosphere
for centuries. 

A herbivore doesn't have to release methane - its a consequence of the
microbial ecology in their gut.  Laurie mentioned kangaroos produce little
methane.  CSIRO and others have looked at changing (innoculating) the gut
flora in sheep&cattle to improve meat production & reduce methane emission.

Most birds have mucher simpler guts than ruminants and much lower methane
emissions - alhough somewhere in Canberra there are  public servants
who should have been listening in biology class.  Forced to estimate
emissions/kg from farmed ostriches&emus for our national greenhouse
inventory they assumed they were similar to cattle not poultry.

Andrew

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU